May 2
My thanks to the Lodging Interactive Blog for this post which raises the topic of Google+1 and what it might mean for hotels.
A little bit of experimenting shows that Google+1 might be really handy for your hotel. But it all depends on the behaviour of your website visitors and the things you say on your website.

I agree with the comments made on the Lodging Interactive blog: If you want to encourage people to "like" - or rather "+1" your pages, you will need to prove useful to your website visitors. To be successful with Google +1 it looks like you will need to think about what you say on your website, just as you need to think about what you say in your emails, ezines and newsletters.

It appears that many hoteliers insist on publishing irrelevant, meaningless, vanity copy on their websites. I don't think you'll get many Google+1 recommendations if your website continues with this policy.

Of course, we're not really sure what effect all this +1 stuff will have on your search engine page position. It's still a Google Experiment. Just remember that's where the use of XML hotel price feeds for Google Places started and I bet 99% of hotels around the world know nothing about the implications of that particular experiment.

+1 recommendations (similar to a Facebook "like") should hopefully only occur when your web page is of value to someone. For it to be of value it needs to be easy to read, meaningful and helpful. As a hotelier, you're looking to develop conversations and permission based marketing communications with your customers. If you don't know what any of that means, contact me and I'll explain how you can make your marketing so much more successful.

I'll keep monitoring this Google+1 story and I'll let you know what I find.

If it has a positive effect on the way hotels use their own websites, it can only be a good thing.

Posted by HotelBlogger

0 Trackbacks

  1. No Trackbacks

0 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  1. No comments

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications
To leave a comment you must approve it via e-mail, which will be sent to your address after submission.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.